About this video
Who doesn’t know this? A truly exciting “trial” takes place at a “German court” (cf. § 15 GVG) and suddenly everything is turned upside down, and already at the entrance at the so-called “security check,” or at the latest in the context of a nice special setup in front of the “trial” room, one’s phones, laptops, cameras, and other electronic devices are taken away? – Temporarily, of course. For a nice token.
What is this supposed to serve? Perhaps the SECURITY in the “trial” room? Like § 176 para. 1 GVG ?? Which states: “The maintenance of order in the session is the responsibility of the chairperson.”
Well, let us remember, for example, the well-known scandal case surrounding the “child slave” Dave Möbius. Dave and his sister Pia Möbius were separated from their parents in the context of a family dispute at the “district court” Wittmund and locked away in different children’s homes or prisons. Since Dave had a strong will to assert his fundamental right to freedom from Article 2 GG, he managed to exercise this fundamental right several times. Except for the successful escape due to the provided escape assistance, all previous escape attempts ended with his capture by employees of the private security company CONSTELLIS, which belongs to the American Blackwater corporation. Dave, due to his “freedom tendencies,” was ultimately deprived of his freedom for a period of THREE YEARS in the context of an absolutely illegal “covert placement” in one of the various children’s prisons operated by companies like WILDFANG GmbH on Rügen and elsewhere.
At the “trial” at the “district court” Wittmund, criminal division against the freelance journalist and moderator of various educational formats such as “Bewusst-TV” Jo Conrad and against Angela Masch (†), both of whom had helped Dave Möbius on his penultimate escape, there were exactly such “security measures”……
A member of the LICHTBLICK – Association for Social Responsibility e.V., which occasionally accompanies “trials” at various “courts” and sometimes is also a participant in such “trials,” was to be heavily regulated in advance at the District Court Bielefeld, as he is known to the “judges” as a representative of the FREE (and not purchasable) PRESS.
With various “tricks,” the president of the “District Court” Bielefeld listed in the economic database “UPIK” (https://www.dnb.com/de-de/upik/nutzungsbedingungen/)
Company information
Address:
Niederwall 71
33602 Bielefeld
attempted to prohibit the freelance journalist from exercising his FREE PRESS ACTIVITY from the “District Court Bielefeld.”
With a clever lawsuit before the Administrative Court Minden, the association member was able to assert his fundamental rights based on PRESS FREEDOM from Article 5 para. 1 sentence 2 GG in a preliminary injunction procedure.
The decision obtained is likely to be of general interest and of equal importance.
All people, regardless of their involvement in seemingly “legal proceedings” at so-called “courts,” should notice that in increasingly difficult times, it becomes ever more important to network. Within the social solidarity alliance of LICHTBLICK – Association for Social Responsibility e.V., all people can and should support each other and draw on the expertise and skills of other association members.
Strong alone – unbeatable together!
The association’s details:
Lichtblick – Association for Social Responsibility e.V.
Main St. 96
09544 Neuhausen
Mobile: 0157 544 79 537
Email: Familienwohl@yahoo.com
Internet: https://lichtblickevblog.wordpress.com/lichtblick-e-v-erfolge/
Association register:
District Court Chemnitz VR 3813
The association is non-profit
Here’s how you can support us:
Lichtblick-e.V@gmx.de (ONLY Paypal)
